Political scientist Anton Jager defines 'hyperpolitics' as a trend of high political engagement paired with a decline in membership for traditional institutions like parties and unions.

Political scientist Anton Jager describes a modern phenomenon called "hyperpolitics," characterized by increased political activity—such as protests and voter turnout—alongside a decline in membership for political parties, unions, and civil society organizations. Jager argues this trend, which emerged following the 2008 financial crisis, differs from 20th-century mass politics and the "post-politics" era of the 1990s and 2000s.

Defining the Hyperpolitical Paradox

Jager defines hyperpolitics as "re-politicization without re-institutionalization." While citizens are increasingly active, this engagement often fails to translate into concrete policy changes or shifts in power structures. For example, despite high polling support for public healthcare in the United States, there is a negative correlation between those public preferences and the likelihood of such policies being implemented.

Examples of Hyperpolitical Movements

Movements cited as examples of hyperpolitics include the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests in the U.S., the "yellow vest" protests in France between 2018 and 2020, and the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Jager notes that these movements often lack official leadership or long-term institutional affiliation, leading to rapid dispersal after initial mobilization.

Asymmetry Between Left and Right

Jager observes an asymmetry in the success of hyperpolitical movements, noting that the right has often been more effective than the left. He attributes this to two factors: the right's greater access to private funding and the fact that the left's goals often involve reversing deeply entrenched power relations, which Jager describes as a steeper climb.