Oct 1, 2026
ManyPress

Advertisement

Technology

A federal judge has dismissed lawsuits from Penske Media Corporation and Chegg, which alleged Google’s AI search features unfairly diverted web traffic and harmed their revenue.

ManyPress

ManyPress

ManyPress Editorial

3 min readSource:The Verge, Engadget
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuits Against Google Over AI Overviews
⛓ 2 sources:The Verge· Engadget

Key facts

  • •Judge Amit Mehta, who previously ruled that Google holds a monopoly in search, presided over the dismissal.
  • •Penske Media Corporation and Chegg alleged that AI Overviews diverted traffic and harmed their ad-based business models.
  • •The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove Google was illegally leveraging its monopoly to force the use of their content.
  • •Google is currently running a pilot program to compensate around 100 publishers for their contributions to AI search features.
  • •Publishers can opt out of AI Overviews while maintaining their presence in standard search results.

US District Judge Amit Mehta has dismissed two antitrust lawsuits filed by Penske Media Corporation (PMC) and Chegg against Google. The plaintiffs alleged that Google’s AI Overviews feature abused its search monopoly by siphoning traffic away from their websites and forcing publishers to provide content for free. Judge Mehta ruled that the companies failed to demonstrate that Google’s actions violated antitrust laws.

Court Ruling on Search Expectations

In his ruling, Judge Mehta noted that while the court is not unsympathetic to the challenges publishers face, antitrust regulations cannot substitute for legislative action regarding the economic impact of new technologies. He emphasized that the plaintiffs' claims relied on an 'expectation' of receiving search traffic in exchange for providing free content, which he stated is not a formal agreement but rather how general search engines function.

Publisher Concerns and Google's Response

The lawsuits had claimed that Google coerced publishers into supplying content for AI Overviews by threatening to remove them from search results, thereby hurting their advertising revenue. While publishers have the option to exclude their content from AI Overviews while remaining in traditional search results, many have reported significant traffic declines. Meanwhile, Google has reportedly initiated a pilot program to pay approximately 100 publishers for contributions to its AI features, including Gemini and AI Overviews.

Timeline

  1. 2024
    Judge Amit Mehta issued a landmark ruling finding that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services.
  2. Last year
    Penske Media Corporation and Chegg filed separate antitrust lawsuits against Google.
  3. Wednesday
    Judge Mehta dismissed the lawsuits filed by PMC and Chegg.

Advertisement

This article was independently rewritten by ManyPress editorial AI from reporting originally published by The Verge, Engadget.

Technology