Matthew Fuhrmann discusses the conditions required for countries to gain geopolitical leverage through latent nuclear capabilities without building weapons.

Key facts
- •Latent nuclear deterrence involves gaining geopolitical leverage without the actual construction of nuclear weapons.
- •Success requires the technical means to produce fissile material, such as highly enriched uranium or plutonium.
- •A country must be able to reassure others that it is not currently arming to maintain the credibility of its latent status.
- •Germany, the Netherlands, and Japan are identified as countries well-positioned to benefit from this strategy.
- •High stakes are necessary to make threats regarding potential nuclear development credible.
In a follow-up to his 2025 analysis, Matthew Fuhrmann examines the effectiveness of latent nuclear deterrence, a strategy where countries leverage the potential to build nuclear weapons without actually doing so. Fuhrmann identifies three conditions necessary for this strategy to succeed: the technical capacity to produce fissile material, the ability to reassure the international community that they are not currently arming, and the presence of high stakes to ensure threats remain credible.
Conditions for Success
According to Fuhrmann, the primary requirement for latent deterrence is the possession of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium or plutonium. Beyond technical capability, a country must successfully convince foreign observers that it is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Finally, the strategy requires high stakes, which are essential for making the threat of future nuclear development or use believable to adversaries.
Countries Well-Positioned for Latent Deterrence
Fuhrmann maintains that Germany, the Netherlands, and Japan remain the best-positioned nations to utilize this strategy. These countries possess the technical means to produce fissile material, making it clear to the international community that they could develop a nuclear weapon quickly if they chose to. Simultaneously, there is little belief among foreign observers that these nations are currently operating clandestine nuclear weapons programs, which enhances the credibility of their potential threats.
Advertisement
This article was independently rewritten by ManyPress editorial AI from reporting originally published by War on the Rocks.


